High levels of circulating progesterone during follicular development increase fertility
PRID Delta’s surface area is 155cm2 compared with 120cm2 for a T‑shape device.
The surface area of PRID Delta and its position within the animal ensures maximal contact and exchange with the vaginal environment. Increased contact surface area between the device and the vaginal mucosa increases the progesterone absorption and thus, the circulating progesterone levels.
PRID Delta’s triangular shape allows even pressure distribution on the reproductive tract, with the sides completely leaning against the vagina’s inner wall, for both maximal surface contact and animal comfort.
T-shaped devices sit straight in the vagina, applying pressure with each of their branch extremities.
PRID Delta has been designed to provide optimal retention rates under field conditions, as shown in Figure 3.
All intravaginal devices are foreign bodies and as such, can induce a local reaction. Studies have shown that when using intravaginal devices it is normal to see increased vaginal secretions and that these disappear within three days after removal and do not affect fertility..
Vaginal secretions have no impact on fertility | |||
---|---|---|---|
Score at removal of the PRID Delta | 0 (clear or no debris) |
1 (small flecks of purulent debris) |
> 1 (abundant flecks of purulent debris) |
Vaginal Discharge | 11% (92/820) |
54% (443/820) |
35% (285/820) |
Pregnancy per AI, D 32 | 37.9% 1 | 39.3% 1 | 42.7% 1 |
1 P: 0.6 Non statisticlaly significant
Cumulative 9% more cows pregnant after 1st & 2nd AI with PRID Delta
Several different breeding protocols exist for cattle. PRID Delta can be used with most of them. Contact your Ceva representative to discuss how PRID Delta can help you optimize cattle fertility.
The causes of poor fertility performance are many and differ from farm to farm therefore specific targeted programs need to be implemented for those specific circumstances. Do not hesitate to contact a Ceva representative to discuss how Prid Delta can help your customers improve fertility performance.
Ruminant Regional Sales Manager:
Michelle Hutchison
michelle.hutchison@ceva.com
(306) 921-6137
Ruminant Veterinary Services Manager:
Dr David Lamb
david.lamb@ceva.com
Ruminant Regional Sales Manager:
Isabelle Tremblay-Summers
isabelle.tremblay-summers@ceva.com
(613) 266-1847
Ruminant Veterinary Services Manager:
Dr Anne Lemay
anne.lemay@ceva.com,
Customer Support:
1-800-510-8864
service.canada@ceva.com
Product | Ceva Code | AVP | CDMV | VP | WDDC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRID Delta 10 x 1ds | C61411D | Special Order | 123221 | 3911790 | 136071 |
Bisinotto, R.S., et al. “Follicular Wave of the Ovulatory Follicle and Not Cyclic Status Influences Fertility of Dairy Cows.” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 93, no. 8, 2010, pp. 3578–3587., doi:10.3168/jds.2010-3047. Hayashi, K., Matsui, M., Shimizu, T., Sudo, N., Sato, A., Shirasuna, K., Tetsuka, M., Kida, K., Schams, D., & Miyamoto, A. (2008). The absence of corpus luteum formation alters the endocrine profile and affects follicular development during the first follicular wave in cattle. Reproduction, 136 6, 787-97 . Wiltbank, M. C., Souza, A. H., Carvalho, P. D., Cunha, A. P., Giordano, J. O., Fricke, P. M., Baez, G. M., & Diskin, M. G. (2014). Physiological and practical effects of progesterone on reproduction in dairy cattle. Animal, 8, 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1751731114000585 Garrett, J. E., Geisert, R. D., Zavy, M. T., & Morgan, G. L. (1988). Evidence for maternal regulation of early conceptus growth and development in beef cattle, Reproduction, 84(2), 437-446. Rathbone MJ, Bunt CR, Ogle CR, Burggraaf S, Macmillan KL, Burke CR, Pickering KL (2002). Reengineering of a commercially available bovine intravaginal insert (CIDR insert) containing progesterone. J Control Release. Dec 13;85(1-3):105-15. Van Werven T, Waldeck F, Souza AH, Floch S, Englebienne M (2013). Comparison of two intravaginal progesterone releasing devices (PRID Delta vs CIDR) in dairy cows: blood progesterone profile and field fertility. Anim Reprod Sci. May;138(3-4):143-9. Walsh RB, LeBlanc SJ, Vernooy E, Leslie KE (2008). Safety of a progesterone-releasing intravaginal device as assessed from vaginal mucosal integrity and indicators of systemic inflammation in postpartum dairy cows. Can J Vet Res. Jan;72(1):43-9. Drake, E., Holden, S. A., Aublet, V., Doyle, R. C., Millar, C., Moore, S. G., Maicas, C., Randi, F., Cromie, A. R., Lonergan, P., & Butler, S. T. (2020). Evaluation of delayed timing of artificial insemination with sex-sorted sperm on pregnancy per artificial insemination in seasonal-calving, pasture-based lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 103(12), 12059–12068. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-18847 Santos VG, Carvalho PD, Maia C, Carneiro B, Valenza A, Crump PM, Fricke PM (2016) Adding a second prostaglandin F2α treatment to but not reducing the duration of a PRID-Synch protocol increases fertility after resynchronization of ovulation in lactating Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 99:1–11
Bisinotto, R.S., et al. “Follicular Wave of the Ovulatory Follicle and Not Cyclic Status Influences Fertility of Dairy Cows.” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 93, no. 8, 2010, pp. 3578–3587., doi:10.3168/jds.2010-3047.
Hayashi, K., Matsui, M., Shimizu, T., Sudo, N., Sato, A., Shirasuna, K., Tetsuka, M., Kida, K., Schams, D., & Miyamoto, A. (2008). The absence of corpus luteum formation alters the endocrine profile and affects follicular development during the first follicular wave in cattle. Reproduction, 136 6, 787-97.
Wiltbank, M. C., Souza, A. H., Carvalho, P. D., Cunha, A. P., Giordano, J. O., Fricke, P. M., Baez, G. M., & Diskin, M. G. (2014). Physiological and practical effects of progesterone on reproduction in dairy cattle. Animal, 8, 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1751731114000585.
Garrett, J. E., Geisert, R. D., Zavy, M. T., & Morgan, G. L. (1988). Evidence for maternal regulation of early conceptus growth and development in beef cattle, Reproduction, 84(2), 437-446.
Rathbone MJ, Bunt CR, Ogle CR, Burggraaf S, Macmillan KL, Burke CR, Pickering KL (2002). Reengineering of a commercially available bovine intravaginal insert (CIDR insert) containing progesterone. J Control Release. Dec 13;85(1-3):105-15.
Van Werven T, Waldeck F, Souza AH, Floch S, Englebienne M (2013). Comparison of two intravaginal progesterone releasing devices (PRID Delta vs CIDR) in dairy cows: blood progesterone profile and field fertility. Anim Reprod Sci. May;138(3-4):143-9.
Walsh RB, LeBlanc SJ, Vernooy E, Leslie KE (2008). Safety of a progesterone-releasing intravaginal device as assessed from vaginal mucosal integrity and indicators of systemic inflammation in postpartum dairy cows. Can J Vet Res. Jan;72(1):43-9.
Drake, E., Holden, S. A., Aublet, V., Doyle, R. C., Millar, C., Moore, S. G., Maicas, C., Randi, F., Cromie, A. R., Lonergan, P., & Butler, S. T. (2020). Evaluation of delayed timing of artificial insemination with sex-sorted sperm on pregnancy per artificial insemination in seasonal-calving, pasture-based lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 103(12), 12059–12068. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-18847
Santos VG, Carvalho PD, Maia C, Carneiro B, Valenza A, Crump PM, Fricke PM (2016) Adding a second prostaglandin F2α treatment to but not reducing the duration of a PRID-Synch protocol increases fertility after resynchronization of ovulation in lactating Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 99:1–11
Test your knowledge in reproduction
Take a Quick Quiz on: